Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar has become a fundamental sensing technology in applications such as autonomous vehicles, industrial robotics, smart traffic systems, and security monitoring. Its high frequency, typically ranging from 24 GHz to 140 GHz, enables fine spatial resolution and precise detection of small or distant objects. While mmWave radar excels at measuring distance and velocity, accurately determining a target’s angle remains challenging. These limitations are primarily due to phased array designs, beamforming strategies, and environmental factors. Understanding these constraints and emerging solutions is crucial for engineers deploying reliable radar systems.
1. What Are the Principles Behind Angle Measurement in mmWave Radar?
Angle measurement in mmWave radar relies on phase differences between signals received at multiple antenna elements. Phased arrays enable electronic beam steering by adjusting the phase of each antenna element, eliminating the need for mechanical rotation. This allows rapid scanning across a wide field of view while maintaining high detection rates.
The radar calculates angles by measuring time delay and phase shift between transmitted and received signals. Unlike distance and velocity, which can often be extracted directly from frequency shifts, angle estimation is highly sensitive to array design, element spacing, and signal processing techniques.
2. Why Is Angular Resolution Limited in Phased Arrays and Beamforming?
2.1 Number of Antenna Elements
Angular resolution is strongly influenced by the number of transmit and receive antennas. More elements produce narrower beams, enabling finer discrimination between closely spaced targets. For instance, a 4×4 MIMO configuration theoretically resolves targets separated by 14 degrees. However, in practice, reflections from nearby objects may merge, reducing the effective resolution (Nature Scientific Reports).
2.2 Beam Steering Precision
Radar beam steering depends on discrete phase steps. Large increments can misalign the beam with the target, reducing angular accuracy. Smaller increments improve resolution but increase hardware complexity and cost (arXiv:1909.12024).
2.3 Side Lobe Interference
Beamforming produces side lobes, secondary peaks that can cause false detections or interfere with neighboring targets. Optimizing array geometry, weighting, and processing is essential to reduce side lobe effects and improve angle accuracy (arXiv:2505.10150).
3. What Real-World Challenges Affect Angular Accuracy?
3.1 Close-Range Target Ambiguity
In urban streets, industrial floors, or warehouses, multiple objects may occupy similar angles. When reflections fall within the radar’s angular resolution limit, angular ambiguity occurs, making it difficult to track or classify targets accurately (Nature Scientific Reports).
3.2 Environmental Interference
Multipath reflections, scattering, and occlusion can distort received signals. Dense urban or indoor environments with reflective surfaces can reduce angle measurement accuracy, making robust signal processing essential (arXiv:1909.12024).
3.3 Signal Processing Limitations
Traditional techniques like FFT-based beamforming or CFAR detection may struggle under low SNR or multi-target conditions. Weak reflections may be masked, and noise can produce false peaks, highlighting the need for advanced algorithms.
4. How Can Angular Precision Be Improved?
4.1 Spatial Pseudo-Peak Suppression
Pseudo-peak suppression reduces false peaks in the angular spectrum, allowing closely spaced targets to be distinguished more effectively (Nature Scientific Reports).
4.2 Deep Learning and AI-Based Processing
Deep learning algorithms analyze radar data in the angle-Doppler domain, identifying true targets in noisy, multi-target environments. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can compensate for beamforming and side lobe limitations (arXiv:2505.10150).
4.3 Hybrid Array Architectures
Phase shifters combined with true-time-delay (TTD) elements enable wide angular coverage while maintaining high-resolution performance. This hybrid design adapts dynamically to target motion and environmental conditions (IEEE Access).
4.4 Multi-Mode Radar Operation
Alternating between MIMO and beamforming modes allows radars to optimize angular and range resolution for different scenarios. MIMO mode is suitable for dense urban areas, while beamforming maximizes coverage in open spaces.
5. What Does the Future Hold for mmWave Radar Angle Measurement?
-
Higher Antenna Density: Increasing array elements narrows beams, enhancing angular resolution for closely spaced targets.
-
Adaptive Algorithms: AI-powered adaptive beamforming optimizes angle detection in real time.
-
Sensor Fusion: Combining radar with LiDAR or cameras compensates for angular limitations, improving perception reliability.
-
Miniaturization and Cost Reduction: Advances in semiconductor technology enable high-performance radar arrays at lower cost, expanding deployment opportunities.
6. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: What is angular resolution in mmWave radar?
A: Angular resolution is the radar’s ability to distinguish two targets at different angles, crucial for separating closely spaced objects.
Q2: How do phased arrays improve angle measurement?
A: They steer the radar beam electronically, enabling precise scanning without mechanical rotation.
Q3: How do environment and reflections impact angular accuracy?
A: Multipath, scattering, and occlusion can distort or block signals, reducing measurement precision.
Q4: Can AI enhance angular precision?
A: Yes. AI and deep learning frameworks can detect targets more accurately under low SNR or multi-target scenarios.
Q5: What trends are shaping mmWave radar angle measurement?
A: Higher antenna density, adaptive algorithms, hybrid array architectures, and sensor fusion are the key future trends.